Just
hit the brakes quicker! How?
The answer is to use
today's high speed computers, sensing systems and control systems to yield
automatic and much faster reaction times. Humans typically are
expected to use up about 3/4 of a second to react to an emergency and start
hitting the brakes. The computers used in modern sensing and control systems
can easily cut that decision/reaction time by a factor of 10 to .075
second.
Typical
Human Reaction Times
Remember your last
Department of Motor Vehicles written test? They usually have one
multiple question on stopping distances. They gave you a speed and you
had to pick which of the four distances shown would represent the actual
automobile stopping distance. I never bothered to memorize those
answers because a long time ago I just worked it out backwards
mathematically. Whenever I encountered this question again, I just
cranked out the simple math. The California DMV formula for stopping
distances used to assume it would take the average driver 3/4 of a second at
speed just to react to an impending emergency and get one's foot stomping on
the brake pedal (reaction time). Then hitting the brakes hard, the
driver will be able to get stopped (decelerate) at a steady maximum of 1/2
g. Simple as that. For some reason the DMV has increased the
reaction time to 2.5 seconds and the same 1/2 braking
deceleration. They may be worried that people are paying attention less
than ever. This yields the following results:
Initial
Speed |
Reaction
Distance |
Deceleration
Distance |
Total
Stopping Distance |
35
mph |
128.3
feet |
81.7
feet |
210
feet* |
45
mph |
165.0
feet |
135.2
feet |
300
feet |
55
mph |
201.6
feet |
201.9
feet |
403
feet* |
65
mph |
238.3
feet |
282.1
feet |
520
feet |
75
mph |
274.9
feet |
375.6
feet |
650
feet |
80
mph |
293.3
feet |
427.3
feet |
720
feet |
90
mph |
329.9
feet |
540.8
feet |
870
feet |
100
mph |
366.6
feet |
667.7
feet. |
1034
feet |
*1999
officially recognized DMV reaction plus deceleration
distances are given at: DMV
|
Automobile
traffic is not that tightly packed because humans need more
reaction times than computers do. Most, not all, drivers
follow other cars with a spacing that they are comfortable with. Normal
drivers do not relish focusing their entire concentration to follow right on
someone's tail for minutes or hours on end. Without any mathematical
formulas, whatsoever, we all figure out how close we can follow and
still get safely stopped if something weird happens just in front of
us. We know the vehicle in front of us CANNOT instantly STOP! We
adjust our spacing mentally by simply including a factor for the distance
the other driver would take to stop once we see his brake lights appear.
(You
may have read about a section of a San Diego, California freeway that is
currently being used to test automatic computer driven automobiles. The cars
travel at 65 MPH autonomously - while spaced just feet apart from each
other. The benefit in tightly packing traffic is more people per lane
per hour, which means less congestion, and the elimination of building
more $24 million per mile freeways to carry the ever growing traffic.)
Public
Transportation Braking Laws
Public transportation, such as trains, on the other hand, have to follow
unreasonable braking laws which have nothing to do with the reality of
physics. Trains cannot legally follow each other any closer
than the distance required to make a complete stop. This is
analogous to you having to be completely stopped by the point along
the freeway where the driver in front of you tapped his brake lights.
We all know this point has nothing to do with where you could possibly ever
contact his car. His car cannot stop instantaneously! We all have learned to
sense from assorted little cues whether or not the driver in front of us is
paying reasonable attention or off in la la land (tough to check by looking
directly into their eyes). Years of driving experience allow us to trust
that the person in front will hit the brakes and gradually slow down and not
just go piling stupidly into a stalled truck or whatever.
What
do these train laws have to do with SkyTran?
Mainly, it got us thinking about just what would it take to still
follow that train braking law and keep our high density 1/2
second spacing! If you are traveling at 100 MPH, you are covering 146.7 feet
each second. Another SkyTran could be 73.3 feet in front of you (one half
second ahead). Guess what, we can take great advantage of our SkyTran
MagLev drive unit being trapped inside the hollow, roll formed,
monorail track. What if we include a hydraulic brake (for emergency use
only) that could squeeze against a rib that we also roll formed into the
track (it runs the entire length of the track)? Then, no longer is
emergency
braking deceleration limited by the traction capabilities of rubber tires on
asphalt or concrete!!!
Superior
braking has tremendous safety implications!
If we assume we can let the on-board radar computer take 75 iterations to
detect, confirm and apply this hydraulic brakes (75 milliseconds = .075
second) and we further control the hydraulic squeeze pressure to give us a constant
6 "g" deceleration, we can get fully stopped in a
mere 55.6 more feet. Including the 11.1 feet used up while the computer is
making up its mind, the total distance is 67 feet. This actually meets
the train braking law requirement - WOW!
Modern factory automation
has forced the development of very fast sensing and control systems.
Click HERE to read about Siemens
factory visual inspection system that checks 32 different dimensions of a
product and decides to accept or reject each part - at the rate of 1,600
parts per minute (one part every 4/100 of a second)!