Background
of the SkyTran Invention
Malewicki's low cost, lightweight, high speed, SkyTran
personal/mass transportation system concept was first conceived in a
flash in 1990
Doug's company -
AeroVisions, Inc. - was founded in 1974 and
incorporated in 1980 for the purpose of developing, promoting and
commercializing Douglas Malewicki's numerous inventions, many of
which can be reviewed on his www.CanoSOARus.com
Web site. The potential economic importance of this integrated
transportation concept became even more apparent after scrutiny for
technical fallacies. All subsequent structural, aerodynamic,
performance and costs analysis merely continually affirmed the
conclusions. After further consultations with software expert, Frank
Baker, additional innovations specific to the transportation field
became apparent. Shortly thereafter, the two filed for a USA utility
patent. The concept was granted USA Patent #5,108,052 in 1992. In
the ensuing years, the SkyTran system has gained continually
increasing support from the scientific community, has appeared in
mainstream periodicals, been presented at technical conventions, and
thanks to the Internet has received interest in transportation
circles all over the world. The time is ripe for the public to fully
comprehend and support the superior commuting and economic
advantages of a monorail SkyTran system.
A 1960's precursor to the SkyTran concept called PRT (Personal
Rapid Transit) has lain dormant for a considerable time while
awaiting low cost, powerful computers. In just the last few years, a
quiet resurgence in the PRT industry has occurred, led by both
government and private parties. There are currently over a dozen PRT
systems being considered in the United States in spite of the fact
that they are slow (on the order of 35 to 45 mph) and their track
costs per mile is 6 to 10 times that of SkyTran.
We should also note that even though Americans only think of
Disneyland when the word monorail comes up, that several hundred
successful monorail systems are currently used daily all over the
world. In over a century of operation with billions of passenger
miles accumulated, there has only been one documented Monorail
fatality (see data available at the informative www.monorails.org
Web site) . By
comparison in the USA, automobiles kill an average of 15 people for
each billion vehicle miles traveled (42,000 annually). The
implication is that if all surface traffic in the USA was replaced
with three-dimensional monorail systems that the USA death rate
would drop from 42,000 to 933 per year!
The main reason for this reduction comes right from current
statistics that tell us that 70% of all collisions occur at surface
street intersections. Air bags and sophisticated automobile
collapsing structures are sad, expensive attempts to solve the
inherent symptoms of a two dimensional surface street transportation
system. Up above, in the SkyTran three dimensional suspended
monorail guideway world there just is no cross traffic, pedestrians,
children, animals, rain, ice or road debris to cause collisions in
the first place. Trapping the vehicle to the guideway, also means
derailments as a source of fatalities is simply impossible. It is
much better to eliminate the "problem" than to spend
millions and millions trying to solve the resulting
"symptoms" of the "problem".
Skytran Competition — Strengths And
Weaknesses |
Type |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
Benefits of SkyTran™ |
Personal
Auto |
On-demand,
private. |
Congestion
frustrations, land consumption, ownership costs, pollution,
driver must stay fully focused, inefficient use of 3,000 pounds
of material. |
On-demand,
private, one can relax while commuting, very fast non-stop
travel, no parking costs, and no pollution. |
Trains |
Late
1800's — was best way to travel long distances. Made obsolete
by airlines. |
Heavy,
land usage, expensive, slow average speeds, on a schedule, stops
at every station. |
More
capacity per hour, on-demand, much faster commuting times due to
non-stop travel. |
High
Speed Trains |
160
plus mph trains are for inter-city travel. Not considered for
daily commuting. |
Big
and heavy, large land usage, very expensive, on a schedule. |
Once
you have a citywide 3D grid and don't have to first travel to a
high speed station, a 100 mph SkyTran will get you there faster. |
Light
Rail |
Formerly
successful 1940's technology specifically created to reduce
commuting times. |
Expensive,
land usage, stops at every station, slow average speeds, always
tax subsidized. |
Profitable,
much higher capacities per dollar invested, very fast non-stop
travel. |
Buses |
Uses
existing road infrastructure. |
Very
slow average speeds, always tax subsidized. |
Profitable,
very fast, on-demand, non-stop travel. |
Monorails |
Safest
travel (only 1 death in the last century), can't derail, above
ground. |
In
America — unfortunately associated as practical only in
amusement parks. |
On-demand,
private, much faster due to non-stop nature of travel. |
MagLev
Monorails |
200
mph plus speeds, can't derail, no track contact -therefore no
wear. Not considered for daily commuting. |
Very
expensive, large, must travel to a major station, must wait for
scheduled departure. |
Far
lower cost per mile. On a 50 mile commute a 100 mph non-stop
SkyTran beats a 200 mph MagLev that has to make 6 four minute
stops. |
People
Movers |
Automated. |
Very
slow, therefore practical range is short. |
Also
automated, but very fast, on-demand, private. |
PRT
— Personal Rapid Transit |
60's
technology finally coming into use, automated, on-demand,
non-stop service. |
Cost
per mile of track is still $6 to $10 million and boldly defining
35 to 45 mph as RAPID. |
Similar
advantages but lower costs and 100-mph non-stop travel speeds. |
Airplanes |
Champion
for minimum travel time for long distances. Not considered
for daily commuting. |
Must
first travel to airport, check in, wait for scheduled departure
(1 to 2 hrs minimum — spent not flying). |
With
complete 3D SkyTran grids
in both cities, then comparable or faster door-to-door travel
times for all flights less than 500 miles. |
Bicycles |
Low
capital and operation costs, on-demand, healthy. |
Very
low cruise speed, limited practical range, sweat. |
Very
fast, no sweat. |
Walking |
On-demand,
healthy, lowest cost. |
3 mph
speed and max probable 1 mile commuting range. |
None
— if you are commuting less than 1 mile. |
|